Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery ; (12): 726-730, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-995513

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the value of fusion imaging in the treatment of complex aortic pathology.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of 29 patients with complex aortic pathology who underwent treatment with endovascular aortic repair using fusion imaging (FI+ ) technique or without FI (FI-) between June 2015 and June 2021. The perioperative outcomes and morbidity of the FI was assessed and the early results of follow up were evaluated.Results:The mean age of patients was (70.3±7.3) years old, and 24 (82.8%) males. Technical success was 96.5% (28/29). The FI+ group patients had lower procedure time[FI+ , (209±53) min vs. FI-, (306±24)min, P=0.005]and ionic contrast medium[(169±23)ml vs. (201±20)ml, P=0.040]. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI)[3.4%(FI+ 0 vs. FI-6.7%, P=0.33)], and operation-related reintervention[6.9%(FI+ 0 vs. FI-13.3%, P=0.16)] were similar. There were no significant differences in blood loss, fluoroscopy time. Conclusion:FI technique improves the accuracy during positioning in complex endovascular aortic repair, could reduce aortic related reintervention rate, operation time and contrast dose. Further studies and development are needed to obtain optimal image quality and higher precision.

2.
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery ; (12): 210-214, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-934232

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the effect and safety of one-staged hybrid surgery in the treatment of complicated Stanford B aortic dissection.Methods:246 consecutive patients who underwent one-staged hybrid technique with complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) between January 2014 and July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The perioperative mortality and morbidity of the hybrid technique was assessed and the early results of follow up were evaluated.Results:The mean age of patients was(57.1±11.2)years old, and 175 (71.1%) were male. There were 166 cases of left common carotid artery-left subclavian artery vessels bypass + TEVAR (A group), operation time(62±8)min, post-operated hospitalization(5.2±1.3)days; 62 cases of right common carotid artery-left common carotid artery vessels bypass+ left common carotid artery-left subclavian artery vessels bypass + TEVAR (B group), operation time(88±12)min, post-operated hospitalization(6.1±1.8)days; 18 cases of debranch + TEVAR, operation time(236±36)min, post-operated hospitalization(8.8±2.1)days. 246 patients underwent hybrid procedure successfully (The technique success rate was 100%). 1 patient(0.4%)with traumatic aortic dissection (with cerebral trauma) died after operation 7 days. The average follow-up period was 5 years(30.3±7.1)xmonths. 236 patients(96%) without endoleak, 10 patients(4%)with proximal endoleak, 5 patients with regular follow-up, 5 patients with surgical treatment during one year (3 patients with re-TEVAR; 2 patients with opening operation); 25 patients(10.2%)incision hematomas, all these patients settled with closely observing and conservative treatment, and all these patients without reintervention. The rate of second intervention was 2% (5/246) the patency of bridging vessel was 99.7% (343/344). There was no paraplegia and stroke during perioperative period.Conclusion:One-staged hybrid surgery has a good short-term and med-term efficacy and safety for complicated Stanford B aortic dissection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL